top of page

The 150-Air-Mile Blind Spot - Exempt from ELDs, Not Exempt from Risk

  • 3 hours ago
  • 14 min read

Why short-haul and smaller motor carriers still need GPS-enabled, cloud-connected camera systems when the ELD rule does not require a device in the truck.


Short-haul does not mean low risk. Cloud-connected cameras, GPS, and AI-enabled telematics can provide the evidence motor carriers need to defend drivers, challenge fraudulent claims, and control rising litigation costs.
Short-haul does not mean low risk. Cloud-connected cameras, GPS, and AI-enabled telematics can provide the evidence motor carriers need to defend drivers, challenge fraudulent claims, and control rising litigation costs.

By Eli'sha E. Petite Sr., TRS, CPIA | President & CEO, ASE Insurance Agency LLC DBA TheTruckersInsurance.com


Risk Intelligence | Current through August 5, 2026


A small carrier runs dump trucks, containers, construction equipment, refuse routes, box trucks or local deliveries. Every driver returns to the same terminal. The trucks rarely travel far enough for management to think about electronic logs, fleet GPS or cloud-connected cameras. A basic dash camera may sit on the windshield, but no one knows whether it is recording, whether the memory card is full, or how to retrieve the footage after a crash.


Then a passenger vehicle changes lanes into the truck, stops abruptly, or appears in a blind spot at an intersection. The occupants say the truck caused the collision and witnesses leave. The police report records competing stories, and by the time the carrier receives the claim, the inexpensive camera has overwritten the event, the driver cannot reconstruct the exact route, and there is no independent speed, location or braking record. The operation was local, but the lawsuit is not.


This is the technology blind spot affecting many short-haul and smaller motor carriers. They interpret 'not federally required to use an ELD' as 'we do not need connected technology.' Those statements are not equivalent. An ELD is designed primarily to record hours of service. A modern camera-and-telematics system serves a different purpose: it creates objective evidence, alerts management to risky behavior, and helps the carrier respond before a disputed loss turns into an expensive claim narrative.


First, Understand What the 150-Air-Mile Exception Actually Does


Under 49 CFR 395.1(e)(1), a qualifying driver may be exempt from the record-of-duty-status and ELD requirements when the driver remains within a 150-air-mile radius of the normal work reporting location, returns to that location, and is released from work within 14 consecutive hours. A property-carrying driver must also receive the required off-duty period, and the motor carrier must maintain accurate time records for six months. One hundred fifty air miles equals approximately 172.6 statute miles; it is a radius from the normal reporting location, not simply the length of one trip.


The radius alone is not enough. A driver who does not return and report as required, exceeds the duty window, or otherwise fails the conditions cannot simply claim the exception because the truck stayed near home. Drivers who must prepare records of duty status on more than eight days in a rolling 30-day period generally become subject to the ELD rule unless another exception applies.


Do not substitute one record for another: GPS and camera data do not replace the carrier's required short-haul time records. They also do not replace an ELD when the driver no longer qualifies for an ELD exception. The records should support one another, not be used to conceal a compliance gap.


 

Local Miles Can Produce Concentrated Risk


Short haul does not mean low exposure. Local trucks often spend more time at intersections, in stop-and-go congestion, entering active job sites, backing into customer locations, navigating narrow streets, crossing bike lanes, operating near pedestrians, and merging around ports, warehouses and construction zones. A driver may complete several pickups, deliveries or container moves during one shift, multiplying the number of conflict points even when the odometer total is modest.


The smaller carrier also may have no dedicated safety director, no 24-hour claims department and no formal evidence-preservation procedure. The owner may be dispatcher, compliance manager and emergency contact at the same time. That makes automatic upload, camera-health alerts and a simple crash-response workflow especially valuable. Technology can provide the structure that a small back office cannot recreate manually after every event.


The Evidence Gap Begins Before the Lawsuit


A disputed claim is rarely decided by the driver's memory alone. Adjusters, attorneys, accident reconstructionist and juries may examine vehicle position, lane changes, traffic signals, speed, braking, following distance, visibility, distraction, seat-belt use, route history, dispatch instructions and the timing of the carrier's response. Without connected evidence, the carrier can be left trying to prove a negative: that its driver did not do what the claimant says occurred.


A cloud-connected system can preserve the roadway view together with synchronized time, GPS position, speed and acceleration data. Side, rear and driver-facing views can add context where appropriate. The National Transportation Safety Board has repeatedly emphasized that video event recorders with forward and inward views plus clock time, GPS and acceleration data can provide valuable evidence for evaluating how a crash occurred. FMCSA-sponsored guidance similarly describes video-based monitoring as a way to capture events, identify unsafe behavior and support driver coaching.


The Insurance Market Is Already Moving Toward Connected Evidence


There is no universal federal camera mandate for commercial trucks, and not every insurance program requires the same technology. It would be inaccurate to say that every insurer requires cameras. It is accurate to say that connected data is becoming a meaningful underwriting, pricing, loss-control and claims factor. Some programs require a dash camera or ELD connection as a condition of auto-liability coverage; others subsidize qualifying camera-data sharing or strongly recommend road- and driver-facing systems for claim defense and coaching.


For example, Cover Whale states that its auto-liability policyholders must connect an approved ELD or use its dash camera and warns that noncompliance can lead to cancellation. Great West advertises an incentive for qualifying insureds that share camera or ELD data. Northland explains that onboard cameras can provide information that may help exonerate a driver and defend costly claims. These are examples, not a universal market rule, but they show the direction of travel.


A $40 Windshield Camera Is Not a Claims Program


Any video may be better than no video, but an adequate commercial system must do more than record to a removable memory card. After a serious loss, the camera may be damaged, stolen, unplugged, pointed at the wrong angle or already overwriting the event. A carrier should select technology based on whether the evidence will still exist, remain authentic and be retrievable when the claim arrives.


Control

Practical minimum

Why it matters

Road view

Clear forward video, low-light capability and usable field of view

Shows lane position, signals, traffic and the sequence of events

Event data

Synchronized clock, GPS, speed and acceleration or braking data

Connects the video to place, time and vehicle movement

Preservation

Automatic event upload with secure local failover

Protects the clip if the truck or camera is damaged or leaves the carrier's control

Manual capture

Driver event button or simple incident marker

Allows immediate preservation when an automatic trigger does not fire

System health

Remote alerts for power loss, blockage, tampering, full storage or offline status

Prevents discovering a dead camera only after a crash

Export

Original-quality files, metadata and an auditable download process

Supports adjuster, counsel and reconstruction review without altering evidence

Retention

Configurable retention plus immediate legal-hold capability

Stops routine overwrite when a loss or likely claim requires preservation

Additional views

Driver, side, rear or cargo views selected for the operation

Fills blind areas and documents behavior or custody when justified

 

The standard is reliability: The best camera is not the one with the longest feature list. It is the system the carrier can verify, manage, preserve and explain under oath after an incident.


AI Is Useful Only When the Carrier Acts on It


AI-enabled systems can identify hard braking, speeding, close following, lane departure, distraction, mobile-phone use, drowsiness or an unfastened seat belt, depending on the product. Those alerts can help a small carrier focus limited coaching time on the events that matter most. FMCSA-sponsored research found that video-based monitoring paired with driver feedback and coaching reduced safety-related events in the studied fleets; the technology worked as part of a management process, not as a silent device on the glass.


That distinction matters in litigation. A dashboard full of repeated high-risk alerts that management never reviews can become evidence that the carrier had notice and failed to act. The program should define which events require coaching, who reviews them, how quickly review occurs, how corrective action is documented and when repeated conduct escalates. A carrier should not purchase AI merely to tell an insurer that AI is installed.


Road-Facing, Driver-Facing or Both?


For many small fleets, a reliable road-facing, GPS-enabled and cloud-connected camera is the defensible minimum. It captures the external event without recording the cab. Driver-facing video can add critical context about distraction, fatigue, seat-belt use and the driver's reaction, but it also raises greater privacy, employee-relations and data-governance concerns. Side and rear views may be more valuable than an interior view for dump, refuse, construction, intermodal, or urban-delivery operations.


The answer should be based on the operation, loss history, insurer's requirements, workforce, applicable law and the written camera policy. The American Transportation Research Institute found substantial driver privacy concerns surrounding driver-facing cameras and reported better acceptance when carriers used footage for specific proactive safety measures. Industry participants in that research favored event-based driver-facing systems and limited access to footage.


Build Privacy Into the Program Before Installation


Video, audio, facial geometry and other biometric information can trigger different requirements under state privacy, wiretap, employment and biometric laws. A policy suitable for one state or an employee-only fleet may be insufficient for another. The carrier should obtain advice from qualified counsel before recording audio, using facial-recognition or biometric functions, or monitoring an owner-operator's cab.


1.    Explain the purpose. Tell drivers whether the program is intended for crash evidence, coaching, security, compliance or all four.

2.    Define when recording occurs. Address ignition status, parked vehicles, breaks, off-duty periods, sleeper-berth privacy and emergency live access.

3.    Limit access. Identify the safety, claims or legal personnel who may view, download or share footage and keep an access record.

4.    Set retention and destruction rules. Use ordinary retention for routine clips, but suspend deletion immediately when a loss, complaint or litigation hold requires preservation.

5.    Give drivers a fair process. Allow them to review relevant clips, correct misidentified AI events and understand the coaching and discipline standards.

6.    Secure the data. Require appropriate account controls, vendor security, contract terms and procedures for former employees, sold trucks and replaced devices.


Trust is a safety control: A hidden, unexplained or inconsistently enforced camera program encourages tampering and driver resistance. A transparent, event-focused program gives drivers a reason to see the camera as their witness.


Camera Evidence Is Neutral - and That Is the Point


A camera is not a defense witness programmed to favor the trucking company. It may show that the other vehicle caused the crash, that the truck driver reacted reasonably and that the claimed sequence is false. It may also show speeding, distraction, an unsafe following distance, a missed red light or an unbelted driver. The value is early truth. Strong evidence can prevent a defensible claim from being inflated and can also help the carrier and insurer resolve a valid claim before costs multiply.


The danger is not unfavorable video by itself. The danger is a system that creates data the carrier ignores, handles inconsistently or destroys after a preservation duty arises. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e) addresses electronically stored information that should have been preserved for anticipated or pending litigation but is lost because reasonable preservation steps were not taken. State rules and claims can differ, so transportation counsel should design the legal-hold process.


Fraud Is Not a Hypothetical Risk


Federal prosecutions in New Orleans demonstrate why objective evidence matters. In March 2026, a federal jury convicted personal-injury attorneys and others in a long-running scheme that prosecutors said used purposeful collisions, recruited passengers and fraudulent litigation to target commercial trucking and insurance companies. The alleged participants favored 18-wheelers because they carried larger commercial insurance policies.


A camera cannot prevent every staged collision. It can document the vehicle's movement, the point of impact, a suspicious lane change, an abrupt stop, the number and behavior of occupants, a fleeing vehicle or a false eyewitness account. GPS and time data can also help locate other video sources and confirm where the truck was. In a fraud investigation, the difference between a driver's recollection and preserved synchronized evidence can be the difference between suspicion and proof.


Seven Ways a Camera Program Can Backfire


1.       The camera is installed but routinely offline, blocked, aimed incorrectly or never checked.

2.       Only selected trucks are equipped, yet the carrier represents that the entire fleet is monitored.

3.       Management receives repeated serious alerts but cannot document review, coaching or escalation.

4.       Driver-facing or audio data is collected without an appropriate policy, notice, consent or legal review.

5.       Routine footage is retained indefinitely without a business reason, increasing privacy and discovery exposure.

6.       Relevant footage is overwritten, deleted or altered after the carrier knew a claim or lawsuit was reasonably likely.

7.       The carrier exports a compressed screen recording instead of preserving the original clip and metadata.


The First-Hour Crash Evidence Protocol


Every carrier should have one written process that applies whether the crash occurs five miles or five states from the terminal. Drivers protect people first; the office protects the evidence without interfering with emergency responders or directing anyone to conceal facts. The carrier, insurer and counsel may tailor the following sequence to the operation.


1.       Protect life and the scene. Stop safely, call 911, follow lawful instructions and request medical assistance when needed.

2.       Avoid roadside conclusions. The driver should cooperate truthfully but should not guess, argue, accept blame or accuse others of fraud without evidence.

3.       Mark the event. Use the camera's event button or portal so the pre-event and post-event clips are protected before routine overwrite.

4.       Notify the carrier immediately. Provide the location, unit number, injuries, vehicles involved, police agency and a short factual description.

5.       Capture the full scene when safe and lawful. Photograph vehicle positions, damage, plates, road markings, signals, debris, cargo, weather and nearby businesses or cameras.

6.       Identify people and records. Obtain witness information and preserve dispatch messages, bills of lading, time records, route data, maintenance records and driver qualification materials.

7.       Notify the insurer or claims administrator. Follow the policy's notice requirements and request guidance for serious losses.

8.       Download original evidence. Preserve all camera angles, native files, metadata, GPS and telematics data; do not edit, annotate or rely only on a phone recording of the screen.

9.       Initiate a legal hold when appropriate. Suspend routine deletion for relevant video, messages, records and devices in consultation with qualified counsel.

10.   Document custody. Record who accessed, downloaded, copied or transferred the evidence and provide it securely to authorized claims and legal personnel.


Speed matters: A carrier should not wait for the police report or demand letter before preserving camera and telematics data. Some systems overwrite routine footage quickly, and notice of a claim may arrive long after the event.


A 30-Day Plan for a Small or Short-Haul Fleet


A small fleet does not need a national carrier's technology department. It needs a complete inventory, one responsible owner, a manageable camera standard and repeatable controls. The rollout should include every power unit that creates material auto-liability exposure, including temporary and replacement equipment where the policy or contract requires it.


1.       Map the exposure. List every power unit, route type, customer site, backing exposure, prior claim, insurer requirement and current GPS or camera device.

2.       Confirm the legal and insurance requirements. Ask the insurance advisor for written policy-specific conditions, discounts or data-sharing obligations and have counsel review privacy and employment issues.

3.       Select the minimum standard. Require road video, synchronized GPS/time/event data, automatic upload, offline alerts, native export and legal-hold capability; add other views based on the operation.

4.       Pilot the system. Test daytime, night, rain, intersections, backing, cab vibration, cellular dead zones, manual event marking and evidence export on representative trucks.

5.       Write the policy. Define purpose, activation, permitted access, coaching, driver review, retention, legal hold, tampering, discipline and vendor responsibilities.

6.       Train drivers and managers. Demonstrate what the device records, how to mark an incident, how safe behavior is recognized, and what the first-hour evidence protocol requires.

7.       Audit every week for the first month. Confirm each camera is online, lenses are clear, clocks and GPS are accurate, alerts reach the right person, and test clips can be downloaded with metadata.

8.       Review results at day 30. Correct hardware, policy and coaching problems before treating the system as operational, then schedule recurring health and performance reviews.


Questions to Ask Before Buying a System


1.       Does the device work without an ELD, and which GPS, speed and vehicle data will still be available?

2.       Which events upload automatically, how much pre-event and post-event video is captured, and can a driver manually mark an event?

3.       How quickly does the system report an offline, blocked, tampered or malfunctioning camera?

4.       What happens during cellular outages, power loss, a crash or removal of the camera from the truck?

5.       Can the carrier export original video and associated metadata in a usable, nonproprietary format?

6.       How are access, downloads, edits and deletions logged, and can the carrier impose a legal hold?

7.       What video, audio, biometric or AI data does the vendor collect, where is it stored, and who may use or disclose it?

8.       How does the carrier retrieve its data if the vendor relationship ends or the truck is sold?


Frequently Asked Questions


Does the 150-air-mile short-haul exception

mean my drivers never need an ELD?


No. The driver must satisfy all conditions of the applicable exception. A driver who exceeds the radius or duty window, fails to return as required, or must prepare records of duty status on more than eight days in a rolling 30-day period may become subject to ELD requirements unless another exception applies. Review the actual operation, not just the intended route.


Are truck cameras federally required?

There is no general federal rule requiring every commercial truck to use a dash camera. An insurer, customer, contract, state rule or specific operation may impose separate requirements. NTSB has also recommended broader onboard video-event-recorder requirements, but a recommendation is not the same as a current universal FMCSA mandate.


Will having a camera guarantee that a claim is denied or that my driver is exonerated?


No. Video and telematics are evidence, not a guarantee. The evidence may favor either party, may not capture every angle and must be evaluated with the police report, witnesses, physical evidence, law and policy terms. Its value is a faster, more objective understanding of the event.


Is a road-facing camera enough?


It is a strong minimum for many fleets when paired with synchronized GPS, time, speed or event data, cloud preservation and system-health monitoring. Driver, side, rear or cargo views may be appropriate based on blind spots, loss history, insurer requirements and privacy considerations.


Can the insurance company cancel coverage if the camera is not installed or connected?


Potentially, when installation, connection or data sharing is an enforceable condition of that specific policy or program. Other insurers may offer only an incentive or recommendation. The insured should review the binder, policy, endorsements, telematics agreement and carrier communications with its licensed agent and obtain written clarification.


How long should camera footage be retained?


There is no one universal retention period for every clip or fleet. The answer depends on the system, operations, contracts, law, insurance program, privacy policy and claims process. The nonnegotiable control is the ability to preserve relevant data immediately when an incident or foreseeable claim creates a legal or business need.


The Bottom Line


The 150-air-mile exception was not designed to tell motor carriers that technology is unnecessary. It relieves qualifying drivers from a particular form of hours-of-service recordkeeping while preserving other conditions and records. It does not reduce the severity of a crash, prevent a staged collision, lower a jury award or make a claimant's story easier to disprove.


For the short-haul carrier, the absence of an ELD can make connected camera evidence more important, not less. A reliable system can provide the independent witness, location record, event timeline and coaching data that a small company otherwise lacks. But the hardware is only the beginning. The carrier must keep the system operational, respect driver privacy, act on serious alerts and preserve evidence immediately.


Local route. Professional standard. Every truck should be able to tell a coherent operating story when the claim file opens.


Talk before you install: Ask a licensed transportation insurance professional to identify policy-specific camera or telematics conditions and incentives. Have qualified counsel review privacy, audio, biometric, employment and evidence-preservation procedures before activating the program.


Sources and Authorities

·         Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. Current through August 5, 2026. 49 CFR 395.1(e) - Short-Haul Operations

·         Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Accessed August 5, 2026. Summary of Hours of Service Regulations

·         Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Accessed August 5, 2026. Who Is Exempt from the ELD Rule?

·         Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration / Virginia Tech Transportation Institute. Accessed August 5, 2026. Guidance for Effective Use of Onboard Safety Monitoring Technologies

·         National Transportation Safety Board. November 2022. Highway Investigation Report HIR-22/06 and Onboard Video Recommendation

·         American Transportation Research Institute. April 2023. Issues and Opportunities with Driver-Facing Cameras

·         Cover Whale. Accessed August 5, 2026. Driver Safety Program FAQs

·         Great West Casualty Company. Accessed August 5, 2026. InsightDriven Camera and ELD Data-Sharing Program

·         Northland Insurance. June 14, 2024. Using Telematics to Drive Improved Safety Performance

·         U.S. Department of Justice, Eastern District of Louisiana. March 20, 2026. Federal Trial Jury Convicts New Orleans Personal Injury Attorneys in Staged Collision Scheme

·         Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. Accessed August 5, 2026. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e) - Failure to Preserve Electronically Stored Information


Educational, Legal and Insurance Disclaimer


This article provides general educational information and is not legal, employment, privacy, technology, claims-handling or insurance-coverage advice. Laws, contracts, underwriting requirements and policy terms differ by jurisdiction, insurer, vehicle and operation. Insurance coverage is subject to underwriting approval and the complete policy's terms, conditions, limits, deductibles and exclusions. Consult qualified transportation and employment/privacy counsel, the insurer or claims administrator, and a licensed insurance professional before implementing or changing a camera, telematics, retention or evidence-preservation program.


TheTruckersInsurance.com is powered by ASE Insurance Agency LLC and specializes in commercial trucking, intermodal, drayage, fleet and warehousing insurance. Driven by Transportation. Powered by Protection.

bottom of page